![]() ![]() The data then ends up in the darknet or with a client, e.g. The actual target, however, is the theft of data in the background, which is otherwise not typical. However: if the attack is successful, as a deception or diversion tactic, only a small volume of data is encrypted or simply renamed, in order to fake an encryption. On the one hand, an attack is carried out that resembles a ransomware assault. ![]() This factor alone demonstrates that considerable time and effort are put into the attack, more is invested, and it is sometimes aimed at a particular victim.ĭata stealers are a type of two-pronged malware. The attack with a so-called data stealer is far more intricate, as it is normally preceded by a spear phishing attack. This type of assault tends to be a mass attack, and is often carried out per botnet. The maximum score in this test is 45 points.Īn attack with ransomware is quickly explained: The attackers try to penetrate the system, launch malware, encrypt the system’s data and demand ransom for decryption. In this case, the test candidate receives the full point score for protection. If a protection program detects and blocks an attacker, the attack is considered identified and resolved. Subsequently, each additional step of the attack has to be blocked. It starts out with an incoming e-mail, the detection of the attacker and the evaluation of the types of scripts or accessory tools that are being launched. In the process, the lab examined each individual step of the attack. Moreover, the lab evaluated the 14 corporate solutions from Acronis, Avast, Bitdefender (two versions), Comodo, F-Secure, G DATA, Malwarebytes, McAfee, Microsoft, Sangfor, Sophos, Symantec and VMware.Įach product in this test was required to successfully withstand 5 scenarios with ransomware and 5 scenarios with data stealers. The test line-up involved 15 products for consumer users from Acronis, Avast, AVG, Bitdefender, BullGuard, F-Secure, G DATA, Malwarebytes, McAfee, Microsoft, Microworld, Norton, PC Matic, and VIPRE Security. 29 products in the Advanced Threat Protection test The findings are very interesting, as the solutions for corporate users were highly effective in withstanding all attacks, whereas two products for consumer users had problems. In the December test, the lab carried out 5 special attacks with ransomware and 5 attacks with so-called data stealers. As these tests involve a great deal of time and effort, the attacks per product are limited to 10 scenarios. The Advanced Threat Protection tests from AV-TEST evaluate protection software in the lab using very realistic and dynamic attack scenarios.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |